Artem
Muchnik
Mark Shirk
GVPT200
Response
paper #1: Six Principles of Political Realism by Hans J. Morgenthau
Of the different political theories, I
personally think that Morgenthau’s theory of political realism is one of the
most sensible approaches to politics in the current world, even though that
approach is slightly outdated. With the theory of realism it is possible one of
the safest ways to approach politics in the current world because of all the
current conflicts going on in the world; and the theory of realism revolving
around such concepts as power, security and states in anarchy. Realism in my
opinion is possibly the most successful theory due to the idea of self-help for
the government. In the reading Hans Morgenthau clearly demonstrates why Realism
is possibly the most sensible way to live by for a state by using the six
principles of realism.
Principle one states that, “Political realism believes that politics, like
society in general, is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human
nature.” In my opinion meaning that in order to function properly the laws
governing the state have to be reasonable, and in the society’s favor. The
second principle of realism is more openly interpreted as it has to do with the
power of the state; and in order to succeed in international politics it is
important to have interest defined in terms of power. “We assume that statesmen
think and act in terms of interest defined as power” I assume that means that
the statesmen are more concerned with the power aspect of politics in order to
maintain the security of the state. The third principle of political realism is
similar to the second one in terms of power; but its other important point is
that power isn’t always the fixed concept once and for all. In the fourth
principle Morgenthau states, “Political realism is aware of the moral
significance of political action” which means that it is important for the
states’ government to address problems in a rational and moral way. The fifth
principle correlates with the fourth and is that in political realism the
states will not disclose their real moral aspirations. Finally the sixth
principle finishes off by stating, “He thinks in terms of interest defined as
power” when addressing the political realist.
For example in the current world and the conflict
in Syria, a realist approach is probably the more rational way to deal with it.
Although the president of Syria could justify his actions under a political
theory, in our political view it is immoral; and the USA’s involvement would
not be the best approach due to the fact that it would possibly arise more
problems for the USA, although if we followed the self-help approach and
avoided this conflict I presume we might be better off.
Overall, the concept of realism might be outdated,
but in my opinion its one of the most plausible theories due to the fact that
it creates a more secure environment for the state, and since security is
equivalent to physical survival it is an important theory to employ for the
state’s prosperity.
Your first paragraph was a good introduction and the reader knows from the first sentence that you side with realism. The following body paragraph, though, is a summary of the six principles and you don't interject any of your opinion or support for why you believe realism is the best theory. I liked the example of Syria because it is so relevant right now but you talked about morals and realists don't believe the context of a problem that influences how people makes decisions plays a role in international relations. Your conclusion paragraph was a good summary of your overall argument. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI really like how you state your opinion right away and your conclusion really raps everything up nicely. I felt that the paragraph about the six principles was a little too much of a summary. I wrote about six principles too and I found it difficult not summarize as well, but adding your opinion in and not depending so much on the quote I think would really help. Overall it was really a really good paper.
ReplyDeleteI like your introduction and how you state what you believe in. In your second paragraph though though you had a lot of summary. Also, one thing I disagreed with in your paper was that you said that realism is outdated. One of the main ideas of realism is that it is a timeless theory. While I do believe that times have changed and that realism might not be the best government strategy, I do not believe it is outdated.
ReplyDeleteYou say that in order to function properly, the laws governing the state must be reasonable and in favor of society. However, what if a society favored corrupt ideas and the laws satisfied those beliefs? It is difficult to understand your argument in your body paragraphs, but I agree with your conclusion that realism is the best theory because it guaruntees security. Your points regarding Syria are all true and I agree that the self-help option would benefit America because it would allow the state to avoid unnecessary issues.
ReplyDelete