Whitney Lazo

October 21, 13

An Expanded Debate on Syria

            Stephen M. Walt makes a notable point in his New York Times debate on Syria, stating that regardless of what weapons are used by Assad, the United states should not intervene and I agree. I would also like to add onto this idea and develop an opinion of my own, which is to say that America should not intervene because it is not their responsibility. In addition to the reason that Walt gives about the importance of chemical weapons and their effect on the Syrian people, what is occurring in Syria is not currently affecting the lives of Americans.

            First, America has no interests in Syria, contrasting with Russia or Great Britain, which both have close ties with the troubled state. Because America does not have any valuable interests in Syria, it does not make a difference whether or not the Syrian people are happy with their government. Although America is a great World Power that does not mean the country needs to save all others when they are in need. There are other great powers such as Russia or Great Britain that could assist the Syrian people in overthrowing their oppressive government. America has also recently faced a government shutdown and is currently restoring relationships in its own government, while also improving the economy and the lives of its own citizens. Amongst all this, it is not necessary to intervene in another war or conflict in the Middle East, especially after the disappointing results of the Iraq War, like Ed Husein says in his debate on The Economist. Public opinion would not approve and the nation does not need to carry this burden.

            This may be cynical and is very insensitive towards humanitarian rights and intervention, however that does not mean that I do not care about the violence and destruction in Syria. This should be stopped with the help of the UN or other neighboring nations. No government should treat their people like Assad has treated the Syrians. It is difficult to intervene, for America especially, because of the ties the rebels have with terrorists groups. If America sends aid to the rebels, it is indirectly supporting Al Qaeda. I agree with Ed Husein when he states that Russian intervention is crucial and they must make an agreement with Syria to open an opportunity for peace in the nation.

            In addition, it is important to listen to what the people of Syria want the rest of the world to do. If they believe that intervention would cause military conflict and if they fear colonialism, it may not be a good idea for America to get involved.

            Just because it is the right thing to do, does not mean it is the best thing to do. From a realist perspective, there is no need to intervene in a nation that has no effect on America. I still believe that the deaths in Syria need to be stopped, however the responsibility does not rely on the US.